Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Madhya Pradesh

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Madhya Pradesh. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Madhya Pradesh|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Madhya Pradesh. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Madhya Pradesh/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

Vikalp Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV sources and am unsure how this page was kept. I asked the reviewer for clarification but received no response, so I am taking it to AfD. The sources are poor, providing only passing mentions, and I found no significant coverage after further searches. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. GrabUp - Talk 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GrabUp - Talk 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor sources with only passing mention. Fails WP:NBIO. Page reads as promotion for the subject. No significant achievement can be found that can be considered worthy of notice to warrant a page on the subject. RangersRus (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. The roles and achievements mentioned lack sufficient depth and are backed by unreliable sources, making them inadequate for a standalone Wikipedia article.--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - each individual achievement asserted as a reason for notability is ordinary, and combined are little more than a Gish gallop. Even with seven references, there’s not significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Deora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Can't find anything much different from the stuff already in the article or in the sources. Source 4 is entirely promotional, and source 1 probably is too. A WP:BEFORE search was performed but I couldn't really find anything that establishes notability. If Google Translate is to be trusted, then sources 2 and 3 don't give any more depth either. Procyon117 (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Procyon117 (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(I forgot to add this but just to add) The sources say he has founded companies in different sectors but none of the sources actually say what those companies are aside from one or two. Procyon117 (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Apart from the articles in 'Navbharat Times' and 'Maharashtra Times', the other news sources are not strong enough. This makes it challenging for the article to meet Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines (WP:GNG). Baqi:) (talk) 08:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NBIO. The subject has not made a significant achievement as an Indian entrepreneur, noteworthy nationally or internationally to warrant a page on. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Malodia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources do not provide sufficient significance to justify an independent article. News articles emphasize "concise promotional" content. While the article weakly meets WP:BIO standards, it falls short of meeting WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. — MimsMENTOR ^talk 11:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople. — MimsMENTOR ^talk 11:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Madhya Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He very obviously does not pass WP:PROF; the question is whether the in-depth sources about him are independent enough and reliable enough to pass WP:GNG. Indian news sources are rife with paid promotion per WP:NEWSORGINDIA, and I suspect that some or most of the sources here have that issue. The first two (Patrika and News18) are obviously both taken from the same press release, so do not count as independent of each other and maybe not reliable and independent of the subject. India Today is specifically warned about in WP:RSP and our article has no depth of content about the subject. That leaves only the Free Press Journal, about which I know nothing, but whose writing appears more hagiographic than factual or informative. I don't find any of these convincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]